Criminal Legal Aid
The Law Society met on 12 February. The main item of business was the imminent announcement of the criminal legal aid cuts. It was agreed to arrange a further meeting on 24 February especially to deal with that subject.
The following motion was agreed by a majority at the council meeting on 24 February:
“The Law Society remains strongly opposed to the proposed fee cuts. It continues to have very grave concerns about the Lord Chancellor's proposal to adopt a two-tier structure for general and duty contracts. In particular the Law Society questions that approach as well as the impact of those changes on access to justice and on the effective defence of innocent and vulnerable citizens, as well as the impact on diversity within the profession and the need to meet regulatory objectives.
The Law Society should continue to engage with the MoJ to ensure access to justice is maintained, and the diversity of the supplier base. The Society should continue to press for early release of the Otterburn and KPMG reports to the profession. The Society reserves the right to disengage, dependent on the outcomes of negotiation.
The Law Society calls upon the Lord Chancellor to commission and publish an equality impact assessment on his proposed changes prior to implementation of the same.
In the event that the Lord Chancellor's proposals proceed, the Law Society will press the MoJ to work with the Society to develop a support package, and commission and publish, before any further cuts in legal aid rates, an impact assessment of the initial cuts and other changes on the working of the criminal justice system and defence solicitor practitioners.”
This motion has been published on the Law Society’s website.
On Thursday 27 February the Ministry of Justice published its proposals on criminal legal aid. It pledges to save £215 million by 2018/19 and not to seek any further cuts in criminal legal aid during the lifetime of this parliament (ie until May 2015!). These are the highlights of the package:
The Law Society continues to oppose the cuts. It published a press release on 28 February which states:
Law Society Chief Executive Desmond Hudson said:
“The Government’s changes will have a profound impact on our criminal legal aid members who face uncertainty and very difficult challenges in changing their businesses to meet the Government’s new requirements.
“We continue to oppose the cuts. We recognise that the Government has listened to the views of the Law Society and our members and as a result made changes to mitigate their impact.”
The changes include:
Desmond Hudson continued:
"Our members’ response to today’s announcement will inform our thinking and will influence preparations for the coming implementation and contract bidding process. We will continue to press Government in the coming weeks and months for further measures and to support practitioners through the implementation process.”
The Law Society will be studying the Government's decision and supporting evidence, including reports from KPMG and Otterburn, in detail over the coming days and looking at what further measures the Law Society can put in place to help criminal legal aid solicitors. The Society will continue to consult its practitioner groups, committees and Council Members to reach out to as many members as possible. The Law Society urges solicitors who are interested to contact their Council Members. We will be issuing detailed support proposals in the coming weeks.
My e-mail address is DixonD@cardiff.ac.uk if you wish to contact ne about this.
Please consider attending the Law Society’s criminal legal aid roadshow on 18 March, from 4:30 - 6:30. You can book your place using the Law Society’s website.
The Silk Commission published its second report on the arrangements for devolution in Wales on 3 March. Amongst other things it recommended a “reserved powers” model of devolution for wales, which the Law Society had also recommended. We will be discussing the report at the wales committee meeting on 5 March.
SRA consultation on CPD
The SRA is consulting about CPD. The discussion paper proposes 3 possible models for CPD with the preferred option, which they call Option 1, removing “the prescriptive requirement for solicitors to undertake CPD through specific regulations. [The SRA] would rely instead on existing provisions in the Handbook and Code of Conduct requiring regulated entities and individuals to deliver competent legal services and train and supervise their staff”. The deadline for submitting responses to this consultation is 2 April.
The SRA is holding one of its Training for Tomorrow roadshows, dealing specifically with this consultation, at Capital Tower on 12 March from 4 – 6. I urge all who are interested in this subject to attend.
Our ever-popular Children's Christmas party at Parc Play was a huge success and attracted over 60 children and grandchildren of Cardiff & District Law...
The constitutional principles of the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law were tested severely by the furore which arose from the decision of a very strong High Court bench (Thomas LCJ,...
Autumn....the season of mists and mellow fruitfulness when our thoughts turn to Halloween, Bonfire night, comfort food, mulled wine and evenings wrapped up in front of the television watching box...
The objective of the Regulatory Column in Legal News is to keep local practitioners reasonably up to date with regulatory developments and SRA consultation papers. Here is the fourth – I hope...
Michael Walters - Administrator
Cardiff & District Law Society
34 Ty Fry Gardens
DX: 33029 Cardiff 1
T/F: 029 2045 3334
Mobile 07774 756 297
Steve Roberts - Membership Secretary
Cardiff & District Law Society
6 Castle Court
DX: 33029 Cardiff